Dear Andy

Those names look just right to me. Thanks very much. Have a good weekend
downing (or upping) excellent Cornish beer.

Cheers

Jonathan

On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 01:39:08PM +0000, Saulter, Andrew wrote:
> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 13:39:08 +0000
> From: "Saulter, Andrew" <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard names for sea surface roughness
>  variables
> 
> Dear Jonathon,
> 
> And thanks as always for your help with these. I agree re moving the 
> component names around. So, for completeness:
> 
> charnock_coefficient_for_surface_roughness_length_for_momentum_in_air
> Units: 1
> Coefficient value, based on the Charnock (1955) empirical expression for 
> deriving surface_roughness_length_for_momentum_in_air  over the ocean. The 
> surface called "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere.
> 
> sea_surface_wave_mean_square_slope
> Units: 1
> Wave slope describes an aspect of sea surface wave geometry related to sea 
> surface roughness. Mean square slope describes a derivation over multiple 
> waves within a sea-state, for example calculated from moments of the wave 
> directional spectrum.
>  
> sea_surface_wave_mean_square_x_slope
> Units: 1
> Wave slope describes an aspect of sea surface wave geometry related to sea 
> surface roughness. Mean square slope describes a derivation over multiple 
> waves within a sea-state, for example calculated from moments of the wave 
> directional spectrum. "x" indicates that slope values are derived from vector 
> components along the grid x-axis.
>  
> sea_surface_wave_mean_square_y_slope
> Units: 1
> Wave slope describes an aspect of sea surface wave geometry related to sea 
> surface roughness. Mean square slope describes a derivation over multiple 
> waves within a sea-state, for example calculated from moments of the wave 
> directional spectrum. "y" indicates that slope values are derived from vector 
> components along the grid y-axis.
> 
> sea_surface_mean_square_upwave_slope_direction
> Units: degree
> Wave slope describes an aspect of sea surface wave geometry related to sea 
> surface roughness. Mean square slope describes a derivation over multiple 
> waves within a sea-state, for example calculated from moments of the wave 
> directional spectrum. "upwave_slope_direction" is used to assign a primary 
> directional axis along which wave energy associated with the slope 
> calculation is travelling; in this case "upwave" is equivalent to a 
> "from_direction".
>  
> sea_surface_mean_square upwave_slope
> Units: 1
> Wave slope describes an aspect of sea surface wave geometry related to sea 
> surface roughness. Mean square slope describes a derivation over multiple 
> waves within a sea-state, for example calculated from moments of the wave 
> directional spectrum. "upwave" indicates that slope values are derived from 
> vector components along (parallel to) the axis from which waves are 
> travelling.
>  
> sea_surface_mean_square_crosswave_slope
> Units: 1
> Wave slope describes an aspect of sea surface wave geometry related to sea 
> surface roughness. Mean square slope describes a derivation over multiple 
> waves within a sea-state, for example calculated from moments of the wave 
> directional spectrum. "crosswave" indicates that slope values are derived 
> from vector components across (normal to) the axis from which waves are 
> travelling.
> 
> Have a very good weekend
> Andy
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CF-metadata <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan 
> Gregory
> Sent: 05 October 2018 14:25
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [CF-metadata] standard names for sea surface roughness variables
> 
> Dear Andy
> 
> Thanks for your persistence and patience! Yes, I think are looking sensible 
> now, as you say.
> 
> > [Thinking even more long term, upwave/downwave slopes could be 
> > assigned different values based on wave asymmetry, but lets not go 
> > there yet...]
> 
> ... but it is sufficient reason for future-proofing I think.
> 
> I'm happy with all these except that I would suggest putting the component 
> immediately before "slope", which is what it most closely applies to i.e.
> 
> > sea_surface_wave_mean_square_x_slope
> > sea_surface_wave_mean_square_y_slope
> > sea_surface_mean_square_upwave_slope
> > sea_surface_mean_square_crosswave_slope
> 
> This would be consistent with existing stdnames e.g.
>   downward_x_stress_at_sea_ice_base
>   land_ice_x_velocity
> 
> Best wishes
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from "Saulter, Andrew" 
> <[email protected]> -----
> 
> > Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 10:40:56 +0000
> > From: "Saulter, Andrew" <[email protected]>
> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard names for sea surface roughness 
> > variables
> > 
> > Dear Jonathon,
> > 
> > Thanks a lot, that is really helpful. Whilst I appreciate your point 
> > about whether or not '_upwave/_downwave' are necessary if MSS is 
> > unsigned, I think it wold still be useful to have this since the 
> > _mean_square_slope_*_direction may well get compared with 
> > _wave_*_direction and/or _wind_*_direction. Since and these latter 
> > follow a convention it is useful/necessary not to have any ambiguity 
> > in how these are referenced. [Thinking even more long term, 
> > upwave/downwave slopes could be assigned different values based on 
> > wave asymmetry, but lets not go there yet...]
> > 
> > So, I think we have enough now to summarise the proposed new names and see 
> > how we are doing...
> > 
> > Agreed so far (I think) from earlier mails:
> > 
> > charnock_coefficient_for_surface_roughness_length_for_momentum_in_air
> > Units: 1
> > Coefficient value, based on the Charnock (1955) empirical expression for 
> > deriving surface_roughness_length_for_momentum_in_air  over the ocean. The 
> > surface called "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere.
> >  
> > sea_surface_wave_mean_square_slope
> > Units: 1
> > Wave slope describes an aspect of sea surface wave geometry related to sea 
> > surface roughness. Mean square slope describes a derivation over multiple 
> > waves within a sea-state, for example calculated from moments of the wave 
> > directional spectrum.
> > 
> > sea_surface_wave_x_mean_square_slope
> > Units: 1
> > Wave slope describes an aspect of sea surface wave geometry related to sea 
> > surface roughness. Mean square slope describes a derivation over multiple 
> > waves within a sea-state, for example calculated from moments of the wave 
> > directional spectrum. "x" indicates that slope values are derived from 
> > vector components along the grid x-axis.
> > 
> > sea_surface_wave_y_mean_square_slope
> > Units: 1
> > Wave slope describes an aspect of sea surface wave geometry related to sea 
> > surface roughness. Mean square slope describes a derivation over multiple 
> > waves within a sea-state, for example calculated from moments of the wave 
> > directional spectrum. "y" indicates that slope values are derived from 
> > vector components along the grid y-axis.
> > 
> > Testing the new 'upwave' names:
> > 
> > sea_surface_upwave_mean_square_slope_direction
> > Units: degree
> > Wave slope describes an aspect of sea surface wave geometry related to sea 
> > surface roughness. Mean square slope describes a derivation over multiple 
> > waves within a sea-state, for example calculated from moments of the wave 
> > directional spectrum. " direction" is used to assign a directional axis 
> > along which wave energy is travelling, with "upwave" used to indicate that 
> > this is equivalent to a "from_direction".
> > 
> > sea_surface_upwave_mean_square_slope
> > Units: 1
> > Wave slope describes an aspect of sea surface wave geometry related to sea 
> > surface roughness. Mean square slope describes a derivation over multiple 
> > waves within a sea-state, for example calculated from moments of the wave 
> > directional spectrum. "upwave" indicates that slope values are derived from 
> > vector components along (parallel to) the axis from which waves are 
> > travelling.
> > 
> > sea_surface_crosswave_mean_square_slope
> > Units: 1
> > Wave slope describes an aspect of sea surface wave geometry related to sea 
> > surface roughness. Mean square slope describes a derivation over multiple 
> > waves within a sea-state, for example calculated from moments of the wave 
> > directional spectrum. "crosswave" indicates that slope values are derived 
> > from vector components across (normal to) the axis from which waves are 
> > travelling.
> > 
> > Hope these are beginning to sound sensible :-)
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Andy
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: CF-metadata <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
> > Jonathan Gregory
> > Sent: 01 October 2018 18:29
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard names for sea surface roughness 
> > variables
> > 
> > Dear Andy
> > 
> > Thanks. I think your suggestion of "upwind" is certainly clearer than "from"
> > (and "downwind" would be much better than "to"). Your middle options would 
> > be fine.
> > 
> > > Parallel component: 
> > > sea_surface_wave_mean_square_slope_along_upwave_direction
> > > Normal component: 
> > > sea_surface_wave_mean_square_slope_across_upwave_direction
> > 
> > and your first options would be OK too, except I wonder if they'd be 
> > better as
> > 
> > > Parallel component: sea_surface_mean_square_upwave_slope
> > > Normal component: sea_surface_mean_square_crosswave_slope
> > 
> > since it's the slope which is along or across the direction, and I made 
> > crosswave into one word like upwave, upward, eastward, etc. I think I'd 
> > prefer these shorter ones myself.
> > 
> > But I still have a question about whether upwave and downwave need to be 
> > distinguished anyway for a mean square slope. Isn't avg((dh/dx)^2) the same 
> > regardless of the sign convention of x, if x is the wave direction? If it's 
> > not, don't you have to say whether cross-wave is leftward or rightward, 
> > correspondingly?
> > 
> > Best wishes
> > 
> > Jonathan
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Forwarded message from "Saulter, Andrew" 
> > <[email protected]> -----
> > 
> > > Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 09:30:03 +0000
> > > From: "Saulter, Andrew" <[email protected]>
> > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard names for sea surface roughness 
> > > variables
> > > 
> > > Good morning Jonathon,
> > > 
> > > Was nice to have a weekend's reflection on this, not least because I also 
> > > got a bit more feedback from some of my other waves colleagues (thanks 
> > > Fabrice). 
> > > 
> > > A quick fundamental, the reason we need to have some form of 'along' and 
> > > 'across' follows the same argument as the 'spread' conversation. 
> > > Basically, wave energy in a given sea-state is not uni-directional, so we 
> > > have a dominant/mean direction that gets calculated, but there will be a 
> > > component of wave energy (with associated height, period, slope 
> > > characteristics etc.) that runs normal to this.
> > > 
> > > In terms of what the "direction" really is, the suggestion I've been 
> > > given is "upwave", i.e. a wave equivalent of "upwind" and, therefore, 
> > > same as "wave_from_direction" (correcting my initial suggestion of "to" 
> > > in the previous post).
> > > 
> > > This gives us a few choices for names I think?
> > > 
> > > Least verbose:
> > > Direction: sea_surface_upwave_mean_square_slope_direction /
> > > sea_surface_wave_mean_square_slope_from_direction*
> > > Parallel component: sea_surface_upwave_mean_square_slope
> > > Normal component: sea_surface_cross_wave_mean_square_slope
> > > 
> > > More verbose (but perhaps more clear?):
> > > Direction: sea_surface_upwave_mean_square_slope_direction /
> > > sea_surface_wave_mean_square_slope_from_direction*
> > > Parallel component: 
> > > sea_surface_wave_mean_square_slope_along_upwave_direction
> > > Normal component: 
> > > sea_surface_wave_mean_square_slope_across_upwave_direction
> > > 
> > > More consistent with existing names (but possibly least clear?):
> > > Direction: sea_surface_wave_mean_square_slope_from_direction
> > > Parallel component: 
> > > sea_surface_wave_mean_square_slope_along_from_direction
> > > Normal component: 
> > > sea_surface_wave_mean_square_slope_across_from_direction
> > > 
> > > * if we use _from_direction in conjunction with _upwave, then we need to 
> > > add some text to link the two terms in the standard name definition. 
> > > 
> > > Any of these make sense?
> > > Cheers
> > > Andy
> > > 
> > > PS. Devon is geographically 'up' from Cornwall - but definitely 'down' in 
> > > terms of the quality of pasties, clotted cream and beer....
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jonathan Gregory <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: 28 September 2018 13:46
> > > To: Saulter, Andrew <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard names for sea surface roughness 
> > > variables
> > > 
> > > Dear Andy
> > > 
> > > > Re the direction of the _mean_square_slope, the parameter and 
> > > > calculation method from the wave spectrum is sufficiently different 
> > > > from that for _wave_[to/from]_direction that it should stand alone. 
> > > > There has already been a precedent set for this with waves, where 
> > > > different forms of parameter calculation from the spectrum are given 
> > > > their own names because there is not only a calculation difference but 
> > > > a different physical interpretation of each parameter (e.g. the various 
> > > > type of wave period). 
> > > 
> > > OK, fair enough. So you need 
> > > sea_surface_wave_mean_square_slope_to_direction.
> > > 
> > > I'm still stuck with what this "direction" really is. Can we insert 
> > > anything else for ? in
> > >   sea_surface_wave_mean_square_slope_along_?_direction
> > >   sea_surface_wave_mean_square_slope_across_?_direction
> > > Apparently you want to quantify the mean square slope along and across 
> > > the direction of the mean square slope. Is that right? I'm not sure what 
> > > it means.
> > > Without the "mean square", I'd think that the slope normal to the 
> > > direction of the slope must be zero, but it must be more subtle than that 
> > > in this case!
> > > 
> > > Is there really an ambiguity of to/from with a mean square slope? It 
> > > seems to me that it must be the same (unsigned) number regardless of 
> > > whether you go backwards or forwards on a particular direction.
> > > 
> > > Is Devon up or down from Cornwall?
> > > 
> > > Best wishes
> > > 
> > > Jonathan
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CF-metadata mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> > 
> > ----- End forwarded message -----
> > _______________________________________________
> > CF-metadata mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > CF-metadata mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to