Dear Ranjini, Alison,

I'd like to propose a further modification to Alison's suggestion. Firstly, 
after reading a little about SIF (this is a useful description: 
http://terraluma.net/applications-2/uas-spectrometry-for-sun-induced-chlorophyll-fluorescence-retrieval/
 ) I feel that the "photosynthetic" in "_photosynthetic_radiance_" is 
inappropriate here: the SIF is a small fraction (around 1%) of the incident 
photosynthetic radiation (less than the reflected component) and it has a 
different wavelength distribution.  It is also redundant in this term, so 
"photosynthetic" can be left out. Secondly, SIF is often defined as "Solar 
Induced Flourescence", since adding chlorophyll is redundant. Hence, a shorter 
name could be used:


toa_outgoing_radiance_per_unit_wavelength_due_to_solar_induced_fluorescence 
(Canonical units: W m-2 sr-1 m-1)


'The abbreviation "toa" means top of atmosphere. Radiance is the radiative flux 
in a particular direction, per unit of solid angle. The direction towards which 
it is going must be specified, for instance with a coordinate of zenith_angle. 
A coordinate variable for radiation wavelength should be given the standard 
name radiation_wavelength. The specification of a physical process by the 
phrase "due_to_" process means that the quantity named is a single term in a 
sum of terms which together compose the general quantity named by omitting the 
phrase. Some of the solar energy absorbed by pigment systems of plant leaves 
during photosynthesis is re-emitted as fluorescence. This is called 
solar-induced (chlorophyll) fluorescence (SIF). It is a radiance that can be 
measured on a global scale at various wavelengths and by multiple space borne 
instruments. SIF is considered a measurement of the photosynthetic machinery in 
plants and can provide a direct approach for the diagnosis of the actual 
 functional status of vegetation. It is therefore considered a functional proxy 
of terrestrial gross primary productivity which has the standard name 
gross_primary_productivity_of_biomass_expressed_as_carbon. SIF spans the 
wavelength range 600-800nm.'


Is there a standard wavelength that SIF is retrieved at?


It may be worth checking our definitions of "albedo". I think we have, in the 
past, assumed that "outgoing shortwave" was equivalent to "reflected". Hence, 
we have planetary_albedo defined in terms of the ratio of outgoing to incoming 
shortwave radiation: it should perhaps be the ratio of reflected to incoming 
shortwave radiation, which would exclude the contribution of fluorescence.


We also have a "bioluminescent_photon_rate_in_sea_water" name ... but I don't 
think that is closely related.


regards,

Martin



________________________________
From: CF-metadata <[email protected]> on behalf of Alison 
Pamment - UKRI STFC <[email protected]>
Sent: 06 December 2018 16:49
To: 'Ranjini Swaminathan'; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] new standard name for solar-induced chlorophyll 
fluorescence

Dear Ranjini,

Thank you for proposing this new standard name and apologies for the delay in 
getting back to you.

> Name : solar_induced_chlorophyll_fluorescence
> Canonical Units : W/m^2/sr/micron
>
> Description: Some of the solar energy absorbed by pigment systems of plant 
> leaves are reemitted as fluorescent photons. This signal is called 
> solar-induced cholorophyll fluorescence (SIF) , is a radiance and  can be 
> measured on a global scale at various
> wavelengths and by multiple space borne instruments. SIF is considered a 
> measurement of the the photosynthetic machinery in plants and can provide a 
> direct approach for the diagnosis of the actual functional status of 
> vegetation. It is therefore also
> considered a functional proxy of terrestrial Gross Primary Productivity.

Certainly we don't currently have a standard name for this quantity, so we will 
need to introduce a new one.

Where possible, we try to make new names consistent with existing ones and I 
found a few examples that may be helpful as templates for the quantity you are 
proposing .

Firstly, we have some existing names related to photosynthetic fluxes, for 
example:
fraction_of_surface_downwelling_photosynthetic_radiative_flux_absorbed_by_vegetation
 (Canonical Units: 1)
' Downwelling radiation is radiation from above. It does not mean "net 
downward". The sign convention is that "upwelling" is positive upwards and 
"downwelling" is positive downwards. The surface called "surface" means the 
lower boundary of the atmosphere. The quantity with standard name 
fraction_of_surface_downwelling_photosynthetic_radiative_flux_absorbed_by_vegetation,
 often called Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR), 
is the fraction of incoming solar radiation in the photosynthetically active 
radiation spectral region that is absorbed by a vegetation canopy. 
"Photosynthetic" radiation is the part of the spectrum which is used in 
photosynthesis e.g. 400-700 nm. The range of wavelengths could be specified 
precisely by the bounds of a coordinate of "radiation_wavelength". When thought 
of as being incident on a surface, a radiative flux is sometimes called 
"irradiance". In addition, it is identical with the quantity measured by a 
cosine-collector light-met
 er and sometimes called "vector irradiance". In accordance with common usage 
in geophysical disciplines, "flux" implies per unit area, called "flux density" 
in physics. "Vegetation" means any plants e.g. trees, shrubs, grass. The term 
"plants" refers to the kingdom of plants in the modern classification which 
excludes fungi. Plants are autotrophs i.e. "producers" of biomass using carbon 
obtained from carbon dioxide.'

We also have existing radiance names, for example:
surface_downwelling_radiance_in_sea_water (Canonical units: W m-2 sr-1)
'The surface called "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere. 
Downwelling radiation is radiation from above. It does not mean "net downward". 
The sign convention is that "upwelling" is positive upwards and "downwelling" 
is positive downwards. Radiance is the radiative flux in a particular 
direction, per unit of solid angle. The direction from which it is coming must 
be specified, for instance with a coordinate of zenith_angle. If the radiation 
does not depend on direction, a standard name of isotropic radiance should be 
chosen instead.'

Also:
surface_downwelling_radiance_per_unit_wavelength_in_sea_water (Canonical units: 
W m-2 m-1 sr-1)
'The surface called "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere. 
Downwelling radiation is radiation from above. It does not mean "net downward". 
The sign convention is that "upwelling" is positive upwards and "downwelling" 
is positive downwards. Radiance is the radiative flux in a particular 
direction, per unit of solid angle. The direction from which it is coming must 
be specified, for instance with a coordinate of zenith_angle. If the radiation 
does not depend on direction, a standard name of isotropic radiance should be 
chosen instead. A coordinate variable for radiation wavelength should be given 
the standard name radiation_wavelength.'

toa_outgoing_radiance_per_unit_wavelength (Canonical units: W m-2 sr-1 m-1)
'The abbreviation  "toa" means top of atmosphere. The TOA outgoing radiance is 
the upwelling radiance, i.e., toward outer space. Radiance is the radiative 
flux in a particular direction, per unit of solid angle. In accordance with 
common usage in geophysical disciplines, "flux" implies per unit area, called 
"flux density" in physics.

Your description says the proposed quantity is a radiance, so we should state 
that in the name itself. Also we need to state a direction 
(upwelling/downwelling in air or incoming/outgoing at toa). Since this is 
radiation originating from vegetation on the earth's surface I assume we want 
to call it an upwelling or outgoing flux. It is being measured from space, 
which would suggest a toa quantity. You are proposing canonical units of 
W/m^2/sr/micron. In the standard name table we should write this as W m-2 sr-1 
m-1, as in the existing names. It is fine to use microns in your data files, 
because the Udunits package, which is used as the basis for units in the CF 
conventions, would be able to convert to the canonical unit. The name should 
reflect the fact that you are measuring at multiple wavelengths (m-1 / 
micron-1) so it should start with toa_outgoing_radiance_per_unit_wavelength.

The radiation is being emitted by vegetation due to the process of solar 
induced chlorophyll fluorescence. In standard names we often use the pattern 
'due_to_process', hence I suggest the name should end in 
_due_to_solar_induced_chlorophyll_fluorescence.

Looking at your description, perhaps it would also make sense to call this as a 
'photosynthetic' quantity.

We have standard pieces of text that should go into the definition of the name 
(based on the phrases it is built from) and of course we should add to this the 
text you have provided in the proposal. So, pulling everything together, we'd 
have the following.

toa_outgoing_photosynthetic_radiance_per_unit_wavelength_due_to_solar_induced_chlorophyll_fluorescence
 (Canonical units: W m-2 sr-1 m-1)

'The abbreviation "toa" means top of atmosphere. Radiance is the radiative flux 
in a particular direction, per unit of solid angle. The direction towards which 
it is going must be specified, for instance with a coordinate of zenith_angle. 
"Photosynthetic" radiation is the part of the spectrum which is used in 
photosynthesis e.g. 400-700 nm. A coordinate variable for radiation wavelength 
should be given the standard name radiation_wavelength. The specification of a 
physical process by the phrase "due_to_" process means that the quantity named 
is a single term in a sum of terms which together compose the general quantity 
named by omitting the phrase. Some of the solar energy absorbed by pigment 
systems of plant leaves are re-emitted as fluorescent photons. This is called 
solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF). It is a radiance that can be 
measured on a global scale at various wavelengths and by multiple space borne 
instruments. SIF is considered a measurement of the photosyntheti
 c machinery in plants and can provide a direct approach for the diagnosis of 
the actual functional status of vegetation. It is therefore considered a 
functional proxy of terrestrial gross primary productivity which has the 
standard name gross_primary_productivity_of_biomass_expressed_as_carbon.'

Does that sound okay?

Best wishes,
Alison

------
Alison Pamment                                 Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data Archival    Email: [email protected]
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.

From: CF-metadata <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ranjini 
Swaminathan
Sent: 14 November 2018 09:13
To: [email protected]
Subject: [CF-metadata] new standard name for solar-induced chlorophyll 
fluorescence

Dear All,

I'd like to request an addition to the standard name list for the variable 
solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence. This variable is derived from satellite 
measurements and is available as a product from GOSAT and OCO-2 satellite 
missions at this time.  Here is relevant information regarding this variable :

---------------------------------------------

Proposal for a new standard variable name


Name : solar_induced_chlorophyll_fluorescence

Canonical Units : W/m^2/sr/micron

Description: Some of the solar energy absorbed by pigment systems of plant 
leaves are reemitted as fluorescent photons. This signal is called 
solar-induced cholorophyll fluorescence (SIF) , is a radiance and  can be 
measured on a global scale at various wavelengths and by multiple space borne 
instruments. SIF is considered a measurement of the the photosynthetic 
machinery in plants and can provide a direct approach for the diagnosis of the 
actual functional status of vegetation. It is therefore also considered a 
functional proxy of terrestrial Gross Primary Productivity.

----------------------------------------------

Thanks!

-Ranjini

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to