I sincerely hope you're wrong about these standard names, Jonathan!

We include precip in our met files, and use the lwe_thickness_of_precipitation_amount
standard name to report the actual level of water in a rain gauge.

It is NOT a rate of precip, which is calculated  (roughly, for rain gauges) by a first difference.

If the values in this variable were interpreted as a rate, it would be completely incorrect;  values
that are unchanging convert to a rate of 0, no matter how high they may be.

Maybe I've been mis-using this standard name?

Thanks - Nan




On 1/24/19 9:34 AM, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
Dear Lars

1. If I have (observed) daily precipitation with unit mm/day and want to store 
this in a CF compliant file, should I use standard name
--- "lwe_thickness_of_precipitation_amount" with canonical unit metre and the "per 
day" part is inferred from the time bounds, or
--- "lwe_precipitation_rate" having canonical unit "m s-1",
--- if both are acceptable, is one to be preferred?
You can use whichever you prefer. They would also be distinguished by
cell_methods. The first is extensive in time, so it has cell_methods of sum,
the second is intensive and has cell_methods of mean.

2. The long_name is free, but should be descriptive. I am thinking of this as a 
succinct plot title, so the question is what practical limitation there might 
be in relation to different software. Is it advisable to use ASCII spaces (from
Github issue #141 indicates that only standard ASCII character set should be 
used) ?
I expect others have something useful to say about that.

Best wishes

Jonathan
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata



--
*******************************************************
* Nan Galbraith        Information Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes Group            Mail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution                *
* Woods Hole, MA 02543                 (508) 289-2444 *
*******************************************************


_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to