Dear Jonathan,

On 05/04/2019 14:16, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> Dear Mike and Klaus
> 
> Thanks for your emails. I understand your points, but it seems to me that what
> we have proposed will not make life significantly more difficult. 
> Specifically,
> 
> (1) We propose to have one discuss repository taking over all the functions
> of the current email list, which is for everything except proposals to amend
> the convention. Those are made in a different repository, which is taking over
> from trac. So this is no change of organisation, just of platform. Up to now
> we have not needed to split general queries from standard name proposals. We
> could do that if there is a need, but since there hasn't been a need up to now
> it is simplest to migrate to a new platform with no change of organisation.
> Anyone with a query can start a GitHub issue to ask their question, and we 
> will
> make it clear that this is an expected use.
+1. I think it's really important to make it clear that this is the
expected use case.

> 
> (2) We presently have two email lists, which is complicated, and neither of
> them is a satisfactory arrangement for the future. The one I'm writing on now
> (the UCAR email list) is taking significant effort to maintain (from Brian
> Eaton - our thanks to him), so we need to move it, at least. The other one
> (at LLNL) is OK for distributing GitHub postings but its archives cannot be
> made public, so it would not be appropriate as a replacement for the UCAR
> email list. Thus, if we want to retain an email list, we will need to start a
> new one. It seems simpler not to do that, but to move to GitHub instead, since
> the functionality is available.
> 
> This may not be your first choice, but is it satisfactory?

Fine, let's give it a go :+1:


> 
> Is there anyone who is interested in CF but would not be willing or able to
> use GitHub in future to raise questions that at present they would ask on this
> email list?
> 
> Best wishes
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Klaus Zimmermann <klaus.zimmerm...@smhi.se> -----
> 
>> Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 13:31:50 +0200
>> From: Klaus Zimmermann <klaus.zimmerm...@smhi.se>
>> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed migration of these discussions to GitHub
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
>>       Thunderbird/60.6.1
>>
>> Dear Jonathan,
>>
>> for what it's worth, I am with Chris on this one.
>>
>> Imho a mailing list is the right format to shoot a question when you
>> don't yet know exactly the approach (is it a feature request? a bug?
>> just a clarification?) and who exactly you should ask. This way you
>> reach all interested parties by the standard means of communication.
>>
>> An issue on github is great to preserve history and progress of, well,
>> issues, such as bug reports and feature requests, typically with a
>> rather small subset of interested people.
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Mike Grant <michael.gr...@eumetsat.int> -----
> 
>> Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 11:43:35 +0000
>> From: Mike Grant <michael.gr...@eumetsat.int>
>> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>
>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed migration of these discussions to GitHub
>>
>> [I'm personally happy with Github, but count as an interested person / long 
>> time lurker!]
>>
>> A lot of open source projects resolve this problem by splitting the 
>> conversation into two mailing lists.  One is typically "-devel" for 
>> developers (in this case, anyone working on the standard or proposing 
>> changes) and one "-users" for people seeking help or wanting to report an 
>> issue, but not wanting to get involved in the details.  Typically some/many 
>> of the dev people sit on both lists and redirect misplaced conversations to 
>> the correct list.
>>
>> Perhaps a possible compromise here would be to move all the -devel 
>> conversation onto Github in an organised fashion as proposed and create a 
>> -users mailing list explicitly just for queries?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Mike.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Chris Barker - NOAA Federal <chris.bar...@noaa.gov>
>>>> This list is also used to ask questions about how to best use the CF 
>>>> conventions, not just changes to CF.
>>>> And a list IS a good way to facilitate those conversations.
>>>>
>>>> I also think it might bd good to have a list that recurved 
>>>> notifications of new discussion — though not every post!
>>>>
>>>> Still a listserve fan,
>>>>
>>>> -Chris
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> which is an administrative
>>>>>> complexity, especially as we currently have two different lists 
>>>>>> (for trac and email), which have to be kept consistent manually. 
>>>>>> Anyone can join GitHub for themselves and watch the CF repositories.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best wishes and thanks for your interest in CF
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To get a username on GitHub, go to https://github.com/ and sign up. 
>>>>>> This is free! Once you have a username, you can sign in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The issues on the CF conventions repository are at  
>>>>>> https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues
>>>>>> This shows the list of changes to 1.7 which are being discussed. 
>>
>> Any email message from EUMETSAT is sent in good faith but shall neither be 
>> binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by EUMETSAT, except where 
>> provided for in a written agreement or contract or if explicitly stated in 
>> the email. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email 
>> are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of 
>> EUMETSAT. This message and any attachments are intended for the sole use of 
>> the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. 
>> Any unauthorised use, disclosure, dissemination or distribution (in whole or 
>> in part) of its contents is not permitted. If you received this message in 
>> error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
>> _______________________________________________
>> CF-metadata mailing list
>> CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> 
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to