This message came from the CF Trac system. Do not reply. Instead, enter your comments in the CF Trac system at https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/.
#95: Development of CF 1.5 Data Model -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: markh | Owner: [email protected] Type: task | Status: new Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: cf-conventions | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Comment (by markh): Replying to [comment:24 markh]: I have [DataModelmarkhscratch written up how the data model may look], if the suggestion from my previous post was taken up, to assist the consideration of this. I do not see this as a significant change of capability or approach, just clarity of presentation. Is the naming approach I have adopted for this example helpful? Does this provide a good base for us to work from? thank you -- Ticket URL: <https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/95#comment:26> CF Metadata <http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/> CF Metadata This message came from the CF Trac system. To unsubscribe, without unsubscribing to the regular cf-metadata list, send a message to "[email protected]" with "unsubscribe cf-metadata" in the body of your message.
