This message came from the CF Trac system. Do not reply. Instead, enter your comments in the CF Trac system at https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/.
#95: Development of CF 1.5 Data Model -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: markh | Owner: [email protected] Type: task | Status: new Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: cf-conventions | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Comment (by davidhassell): Replying to [comment:101 rhattersley]: > Replying to [comment:100 davidhassell]: > > The lack of an unambiguouus resolution doesn't affect the data model ... > As things stand I disagree with that interpretation. But perhaps discussing a new aspect will help shed light on the issue, so I'd like to bring up the subject of "non-standard attributes"... Hello Richard, Good point about non-standard attributes (although I'm not sure how they relate to the global/data attribute debate). [http://www.met.reading.ac.uk/~david/cfdm_0.7.html Our proposal] suggests, in the ''Other Properties'' section: ''The CF data model allows field, dimension and auxiliary coordinate constructs to have other properties not defined by CF, provided they do not conflict with CF, but since they are not part of the CF standard, the data model does not provide any interpretation of them.'' All the best, David -- Ticket URL: <https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/95#comment:102> CF Metadata <http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/> CF Metadata This message came from the CF Trac system. To unsubscribe, without unsubscribing to the regular cf-metadata list, send a message to "[email protected]" with "unsubscribe cf-metadata" in the body of your message.
