This message came from the CF Trac system.  Do not reply.  Instead, enter your 
comments in the CF Trac system at http://kitt.llnl.gov/trac/.

#113: Review of CF feature types
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  mgschultz   |      Owner:  cf-conventions@…
      Type:              |     Status:  new
  enhancement            |  Milestone:
  Priority:  medium      |    Version:
 Component:  cf-         |   Keywords:  featureType, Grid, Point,
  conventions            |  TimeSeries, Profile
Resolution:              |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
\
\
\
\
\
\

Comment (by jonathan):

 Dear Martin

 Thanks for this initiative.

 I don't think the statements are contradictory in 9.1 that certain space-
 time coordinates are mandatory and in 9.2 that a size-one instance
 dimension can be omitted, because the instance dimension is not a
 spatiotemporal dimension - it is just an index running over the collection
 of features. The mandatory space-time coordinates are for the individual
 single features in Table 9.1. The idea is that the feature types are
 distinguished by which sort of spatiotemporal coordinate they must have
 and are allowed to have. However, if the document is unclear, it should
 certainly be clarified.

 It would be good to add new feature types that are distinguishable in
 these terms from the existing ones, provided that these new types are
 required in practice i.e. there are present use-cases for them. This would
 follow our general practice that we only add to the convention when there
 is a need, rather than anticipating possible needs.

 Best wishes

 Jonathan
\
\
\

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/113#comment:8>
CF Metadata <http://cf-convention.github.io/>
CF Metadata
This message came from the CF Trac system.  To unsubscribe, without 
unsubscribing to the regular cf-metadata list, send a message to 
"[email protected]" with "unsubscribe cf-metadata" in the body of your 
message.

Reply via email to