I am generally in support of this `string` attributes proposal, including UTF-8 
characters.  However, for CF controlled attributes, I recommend an explicit 
preference for type `char` rather than `string`.  This is for compatibility 
with large amounts of existing user code that access critical attributes 
directly, and would need to be reworked for type `string`.

I suggest not including a constraint for scalar strings, simply because it 
seems redundant.  I think that existing CF language strongly implies single 
strings in most cases of CF defined attributes.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/141#issuecomment-407185855

Reply via email to