Hi @ChrisBarker-NOAA , one difficulty with the github discussion at #148 is that, because it is a lengthy discussion, it is becoming hard to track the latest favoured formulation of the proposal. In the trac system, as I understand it, the proposal is described at the top of the page and updated by the proposer as the discussion evolves. This means that you can usually get a good idea of the state of the discussion by looking at the top of the page and the last few comments. We could do something similar in github is we agreed that the first post in each issue should be a proposal and be updated by the proposer as he accepts suggestions in the discussion thread, and the proposer's explanations of his initial ideas should start in the 2nd post.
-- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/150#issuecomment-437320764
