I think this is fine. It seems clear, and limits the number of new standard names that will be needed.
Of course, if people use these without specifying the vocabulary and/or some reference to a description of the tests, they lose a lot of their meaning. My aggregate_quality_flag might represent something totally different from the QARTOD aggregate, but I think that's the trade off for limiting the number of new terms needed. I'm not sure if we need to spell that out in the documentation somewhere, recommending some terms to help define the tests that were appliedm or if we can leave it to communities that are planning to make these standard names part of their specifications to do that. Thanks for your patience getting this done. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/216#issuecomment-566720632 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
