@dblodgett-usgs wrote (in pull request https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/203) > With no dissent on this or #203 in a while, ok if I go ahead and merge? If no > response by January 6th, I will. Yes, please merge it. According to the rules, it's already well-qualified (in terms of time and support expressed)! Thanks for noticing.
-- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/203#issuecomment-569396049 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.
