@davidhassell I think that line 474 in the PR https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/pull/224/files#diff-0eab4e85fe4c323f70ce4bce0229dbe6R474
explicitly addressed this, placing the expectation on the data producer that if the CRS WKT is provided and the coordinates provided then these are expected to be consistent with eachother. It also notes that this is not a conformance requirement due to the consistency being contingent on the CRS WKT definition -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/223#issuecomment-573097178 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
