@DocOtak I love RFC2119 and fully support using it fastidiously. It's been a great help to me in numerous requirements documents.
I do believe that migrating the document to use those terms correctly and consistently would be a larger effort that, if desired, should be a separate "project" since it's so wide-reaching. Maybe this would be an appropriate item for the backlog to be discussed e.g. at the annual meeting and implemented as its own issue? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/226#issuecomment-574055449 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
