This issue supersedes #172 and is implemented by #256.

The larger changes to the CF governance process discussed at length in #172 
have been pursued in a separate activity. I would like to capture the 
procedural changes affecting how we use GitHub that were discussed (and, I 
believe, mostly agreed) here.

People who have expressed interest in the original issue:
@castelao @davidhassell @JonathanGregory @ethanrd @dblodgett-usgs @martinjuckes 
@DocOtak @kevin-obrien @marqh @zklaus

People who expressed explicit support in their comments on that issue:
@DocOtak @ngalbraith

# Summary of changes in PR
## Implementation in GitHub / procedural stuff
- [x] **Do we use semver?**Yes, but we shouldn't get hung up on it. Now we say 
we're "inspired by semver".
- [x] **Checklist before merges?** Yes. Edit `history.adoc`, update authors, 
etc. in PR template.
- [x] **How do we ensure that issues are dealt with in a timely fashion?** 
Attach the release frequency to the meeting so that changes actually come in. 
Note explicitly that pre-annual meeting 3 week feature freeze is a feature 
freeze. Tag stuff for milestones, that's motivating, and it summarises upcoming 
changes.
- [x] **Who sets tags and when?** Secretary, 6 weeks after annual meeting.
- [x] **When do we delete branches?** Whenever we want as long as they're not 
protected. Normally after merging.

Questions that in the #172 were considered interesting but are not addressed 
here:
- Who owns docs from the website?
- Align descriptive language in `CONTRIBUTING.md` with GH roles?


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/257

This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
[email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
[email protected].

Reply via email to