Thank you for proposing this, @neumannd. I agree that it's OK to classify this as a defect issue (unless anyone objects), because it doesn't change the intention of the convention, but simply corrects the conventions document. As a defect issue it will be accepted if no-one objects.
-- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/253#issuecomment-607354479 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
