> Now, however (twenty years later), standard names are well-established in > their own right, I would say, and the mapping between different metadata > standards belongs better outside the standard, in neutral territory.
I fully agree with this and the activities of ENVO are better suited for such developments of ontologies (especially since WMO codes also are becoming available in semantic frameworks now). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/261#issuecomment-618910681 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.
