I also agree with Karl, however I was struck by the descriptions, e.g. 'Wind speed measured at 10 meter height'.
Working with observational data, I'd be very interested to know if there's a standard way to indicate that a variable represents wind speed that was measured at 2 m and then modified to represent the 10 m wind. I realize this may be outside the CF realm, but I'm doing some work with the newer Coare algorithm for surface fluxes, and there are some issues like this. Using a long name doesn't provide any machine readability. Without meaning to derail (or prolong) this github issue, any ideas on how to correctly represent this would be greatly appreciated. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/293#issuecomment-695802582 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
