Dear @AndersMS Thanks (and to @erget) for the reference to the subsampled coordinates issue.
> Possibly it could be made clearer in the text that multiple domain variables > may exist in a file. The text uses the plural form in a few places, like in > the heading 5.8 Domain Variables, but mostly uses the singular form. The > current CF convention document uses plural in most places when describing > variables, attributes and dimensions. That would be fine. The last sentence in the new text could changed to read: "*Multiple* domain variables may exist in a file, with or without other data variables. Note that the data variable attributes describing its domain can not be replaced by a reference to a domain variable." > Also, does any particular restrictions apply when having multiple domain > variables? I would assume that for a particular domain, only one domain > variable is permitted? As @JonathanGregory says, this is no problem. I don't think that this needs special mention, as this is has always been true of all types of variables. @JonathanGregory and all - I'll update the PR next week for the various new bits of text. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/301#issuecomment-698979799 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
