Hello, Some colleagues were asking after the status of this proposal. As far as I'm aware, there are no outstanding objections other than the requirement to spell out some rules for the co-management of the two conventions: CF and UGRID.
The CF data model has now been accepted, and the [rules for its management](https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-convention.github.io/blob/master/rules.md) will be in CF-1.9. I think there are some similarities between the requirements rules for evolving the data model, and for evolving UGRID. I am happy to draft some rules for UGRID, if that helps to get the ball rolling. Thanks, David -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/153#issuecomment-702118667 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
