Hi @davidhassell as secretary I consider you the oracle of minting releases, so 
I'm sure you're right. The thought that I had was, if we're merging 
continuously into master, and then only tagging at certain points on master, 
then we'd be updating the dates in the history superfluously, no? Which 
wouldn't be bad, but life is made of tiny problems to solve, so we could 
perhaps do without and do it as part of a tagging checklist.

It might be easier to chat about it this afternoon when we meet at 2 anyway :)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/325*issuecomment-831831259__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!jEebkIorsvLSBsv-vGBfmnvvPZHpMZC0wUyFsJ_m9nXBTpVpCGrpaFf7BMVbKjn6LxeIPcVisSo$
 
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.

Reply via email to