Dear @JonathanGregory, @AndersMS, and all, > Conformance > > For "Each tie_point_variable token specifies a tie point variable that must > exist in the file, and each interpolation_variable token specifies an > interpolation variable that must exist in the file," I think all you can say > is that there are variables of these names in the file, since a checker can't > tell they are definitely the "kind" of variable you intend. > > Regarding, "The legal values for the interpolation_name attribute are > contained in Appendix J," it would be helpful for the author of the checker > to say where they can be found in the appendix.
Addressed in https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/AndersMS/cf-conventions/pull/21/commits/8b8c1850321077711e8d786c53625d1aae60a042__;!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!irvVRQKnhtnc-JLaGpmnQ4ynjO-FpA3Cx--SpGojd__vz_1ZSMNqKFpFvnriI9MS_rFcAhIp19E$ I have also added some conformance requirements and recommendations for bounds tie point variables: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/AndersMS/cf-conventions/pull/21/commits/bdac108def687b64db8693aa4f1e50d45c120ce0__;!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!irvVRQKnhtnc-JLaGpmnQ4ynjO-FpA3Cx--SpGojd__vz_1ZSMNqKFpFvnriI9MS_rFcItwL9wM$ Thanks, David -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/327*issuecomment-887376988__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!irvVRQKnhtnc-JLaGpmnQ4ynjO-FpA3Cx--SpGojd__vz_1ZSMNqKFpFvnriI9MS_rFcsgMUFX0$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
