Dear Chris and David Thanks for this discussion.
In David's revised text > Unlike the domain topology construct's connectivity array, a > UGRID connectivity variable's data is not stored as a symmetric matrix that > indicates the connectivity between any two cells. Instead, the trailing > dimension of ... I think that "unlike" implies it's somehow inconsistent. I would suggest something like, "The information represented by the symmetrical connectivity array of the domain topology construct in the CF data model is stored in a different but equivalent way in UGRID. The trailing dimension of ..." David wrote, "If there are edge coordinates as part of a mesh with faces ... the edge coordinates can only be represented by the CF data model in a second domain that comprised 1-d cells defining each edge and how it's connected to others." What role do the edge coordinates have in the domain which refers to the faces? Best wishes Jonathan -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/153*issuecomment-888999726__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!lJmFpLOcoHlaxoUh2SugObq1husFhqGkHu-34GeVsR4zLk-aG3zmozZG6FqkplKpaYXTPyOOlBs$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
