I agree with putting `draft` in the current-version. I think it would be a positive advantage if it turns up e.g. in `Conventions` (in the text of the draft document), because that makes the status obvious. In fact maybe we could be more explicit and say e.g. `:current-version: 1.10 draft (not yet released, not to be used)` or is that going too far?
-- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/343*issuecomment-1006601253__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!gmDvuWnAHhcNEbiLrMd_YpBiOLpsaphXSMZLtQvPAfGl-qgZxQwkB48attuVS-y0Tyc0w65NRE0$ You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/343/[email protected]> This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
