I can't come up with anything completely objective. Perhaps folks who think they're deserving should nominate themselves (or others could nominate), and if the CF committee chair or anyone on the governance board supports the nomination, the person would be included. It would be nice to provide some guidance though on what we consider "deserving"
We might also consider a "contributing author" category for anyone participating in multiple substantive issue discussions. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/359*issuecomment-1102954282__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!nMppELbD1eEvjqO1q5BW2iRVBOfYOSGXcqawdQpSg160NziYwRkXqUWAcugtm6Hk9KZ-8aE0fs8$ You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/359/[email protected]> This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
