Its a deterent. Just like a laws and social preassure. Sure there will always be people snooping through your source but by encrypting it or using sourceless deployment you are detering a large portion of the population.
Adam H On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:23:48 -0000, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why would you want to? Obviously for a shared hosting environment you want > to protect your code and content but in essence - it is very easy to decrypt > a template to get its source - even if its Java compiled. > > It's a case of - if there is a will there is a way. > > N > Team Macromedia > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 01 February 2005 01:56 > To: CF-Newbie > Subject: Re: Protecting your cfm's and cfc's > > No... > > Not until Blackstone is released and even then it can still be modified. > > Regards > Andrew Scott > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Derick B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Newbie" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 11:19 AM > Subject: Protecting your cfm's and cfc's > > > Is there a way to encode/compile your cfm's and/or cfc's so that they > cannot be modified without your permission? > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Flash for programmers - Flash MX Pro http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=56 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:15:577 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/15 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:15 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.15 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
