> Opinions/advice required please. We are running NT4 SP5 and
> didn't upgrade to SP6 because of the general feeling that it
> didn't go to well with CF Server Ent. I noticed on the list
> the other day that someone mentioned SP6a as an option. Do
> you think we should look into it or is the consensus that
> it should be left alone too?
I definitely think you should look at it. There's only one problem with it
of which I'm aware, and that's how SP6a breaks the use of "fake" URLs when
using the CFCONTENT tag. An example of a "fake" URL, as well as an
alternative solution, can be seen here:
http://www.figleaf.com/demo/mimetest/
Other than that, I think that SP6a is a worthwhile service patch - it has
several improvements in the TCP/IP stack, for example. As with any upgrade,
test it thoroughly before applying it to any production servers.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
'unsubscribe' in the body or visit the list page at www.houseoffusion.com
