Heath-
I've gotten better performance (execution time) using NT 4 than 2000. Not
sure
why this is really as I haven't questioned it, it's just a fact at this
point.
thanks
jason.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lord, Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Server" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 9:12 AM
Subject: Server Set Up Question
> 7 Dec 00 1100
> I need to get an answer on this ASAP today.
> I'd like to find out if someone has a different view of this than me.
> I think this will be more stable than my current 4.0.1 Install.
>
> We have a server with this configuration.
> Win2000 Server SP 1
> IIS 5 As found on CD
> CF 4.5.1 SP2
> Oracle 8.1.6 Client (Note this is the client, not the full DB)
> 2 CFX Tags PGP and Graphics (GifGid)
>
>
> Basically, I need to know what the Stability is expected to be with this
> configuration.
> How this set-up will effect the Speed.
> Any Known Memory Leaks that may be of concern to me with this
configuration.
> Any issues with the use of Auto Locking Session Variables, instead of
> explicitly locking them. i.e. I don't want to do a whole lot of recoding
at
> this time.
>
> Thanks.
> Heath
>
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
'unsubscribe' in the body or visit the list page at www.houseoffusion.com
