Have to agree with Dave there. To summarize the benefits ...
SESSION: faster, supports complex data types
CLIENT: can be shared across machines, does not need locking
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 9:23 PM
To: CF-Server
Subject: RE: Using CFAPP and inactive interfaces...
> Just to add more to why I believe a client scope is better than a
> session scope, and can be backed up in an article written in the
> Coldfusion Developers Journal.
You may believe that one is better than the other, and that may be the case
for your applications. However, "better" is in the eye of the beholder. For
many applications, which will never be clustered, you can get significantly
better performance using Session variables instead of Client variables. In
my opinion, neither is "better" overall - in some cases, you're better off
using one, in other cases, you're better off using the other.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
'unsubscribe' in the body or visit the list page at www.houseoffusion.com
