Does anyone have any ideas about the relative speeds of similarly specs machines running the Windows version of Cf and the Solaris version of CF?
We run Solaris machines here, and I'd always thought they would be comparable or slightly better than any Windows counterparts, however it became apparent that they were going actually quite slowly. I ran up a really cheap box with similar specs to our 'hefty' solaris boxes, connected it to the same db and ldap servers, and ran the same code. The load is not high on either box, so that should make no difference. An average page on the Solaris box takes 20 seconds to load and only 5 seconds on the windows box. (This is no exageration. If anything, I have understated the difference) Is this typical behaviour for a Sun/Solaris box, or is something very wrong with our box configuration? Has anyone else seen this behaviour or has anyone seen behaviour that refutes this? Help!! Regards Darren Tracey Thiess Australia ****************** IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments may be confidential and privileged. If received in error, please contact Thiess and delete all copies. You may not rely on advice and documents received by email unless confirmed by a signed Thiess letter. Before opening or using attachments, check them for viruses and defects. Thiess' liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. ****************** ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body or visit the list page at www.houseoffusion.com
