We run MX through Apache 1.3 on Win2K Advanced Server (SP2) and it appears faster. But I have no evidence to support it.
-----Original Message----- From: Aydin Pirinccioglu [mailto:aydin@;gelgit.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:47 AM To: CF-Server Subject: RE: Apache vs. IIS 5.0 (again?) So does anyone use Apache on Windows 2000 Server? Is it more stable than IIS 5.0 was? Does it feel faster (Load Testing?)? I found out about adding SSL via one of the newsgroups so that's not a problem anymore. -----Original Message----- From: Aydin Pirinccioglu Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:39 PM To: CF-Server Subject: Apache vs. IIS 5.0 (again?) Sorry if this is opening up a can of worms! On W2K Server how is the combination of Apache 2 / CF MX vs. IIS / Apache? Is it more stable than IIS? How about performance? Has anyone been able to add SSL functionality to Apache 2 Win32? How difficult is it to compile this support in? Frankly, I've been having metabase and crash/stop errors with IIS 5.0 and don't need the ASP side of IIS. I'm going to download the win32 Apache and start playing around with it. Has anyone done performance comparisons of (Linux / Apache / CFMX) vs. (Win2K / IIS / CFMX) on the same hardware box hitting a SQL Server on another box? Sorry for all the questions but I just found this mailing list :-) TIA aydin ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body or visit the list page at www.houseoffusion.com
