Sorry, I always made the assumption (I know, I know) that CF would use whatever processors are in the box?
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote: >All of this really stems on how your application interacts with Java/JVM. >There is no really technotes from Macromedia or otherwise which will provide >you with a best fit setting. Whatever else has been said ConcMarkSweep will >give you worse performance than a Parallel GC - for sure. However f you are >not sure, then simply remove any setting of the GC type and the JVM will >take / use Parallel - if you have multiple CPU's you need to use them ;-) > >What metrics have you ran before to give you memory consumption? (DO NOT >rely on Task manager!) > >In Task manager ensure that you have the VM column visible, What you are >probably seeing is timedout requests or queued requests being buffered into >the system. Do you have a lot of Connection Reset by Peer's in the runtime >logs? If you do, then CF is backlogging processing of the requests which >will consume memory. > >I would certainly update your JVM as the GC in later versions is greatly >improved. > >Thanks > >Neil > >-----Original Message----- >From: Douglas Knudsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 01 March 2005 14:04 >To: CF-Server >Subject: Re: memory use and CF > >thanks for the reply Neil, very helpful. Info out there on this is >scarce. I'm going to reply inline below. > > >On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:03:52 -0000, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>OK, >> >>Sorry I was delayed, damn timezones! OK, it looks as though you have a >>fairly beefy machine...A few things you can do here (and these are never >>documents by MM as they are no doubt out of scope of CF!) >> >>I would remove the -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC from your arguments and replace >>it with -XX:+UseParallelGC. If you have a 4 processor box then you going >> >> >to > > >>suffer some performance problems with a ConcMarkSweep. >> >> > >This is interesting, Robi Sen's blog mentions the opposite and I think >B Purcell's does too >http://www.robisen.com/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=FD4BE2FC-55DC-F2B1-FED0717 >CC1C7E0AF >we are using the 1.4.2 JVM shipping with CFMX. Interesting. > >This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, >Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, >Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is >confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the >intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note >that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the >information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have >received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call >our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this >communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions. >Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:10:5194 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/10 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:10 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.10 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
