Hmm... is it just me, or did I send this Thur the 13th and it just hit the list today?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:54 PM > To: CF-Server > Subject: RE: 2cnd instance in cluster causes failure > > I believe you have to use the JSessions for the software based load > balancing to work. It uses the JSession cookie (which contains the > serverid) to know what server to send the client to when sticky sessions > are > on. This is if you're using coldfusion load balancing. I'm not sure > what > cisco is doing. Most simpler versions of load balancers just do it by ip, > either by ip address or subnet, and they will send it to one server, and > then keep sending it to the same server as long as there are no failures. > > Russ > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jennifer Larkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 9:51 PM > > To: CF-Server > > Subject: Re: 2cnd instance in cluster causes failure > > > > You can use the jsessions directly in CF. If you use both the JSession > > and the CFSession, it seems like you could set values in one and then > > try to call them from the other. I don't remember what the differences > > are between the jsession and cf sessions but it seems like you should > > use one or the other but not both. I've heard that using the jsessions > > is more reliable, but that was several versions back and I don't > > remember what the problem was. This may not be an issue-- I only have > > vague recollections that it was something too look out for. > > > > On 4/10/06, Douglas Knudsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > IIRC, the LB should be routing users to the same server on subsequent > > > requests based on a cookie if sticky sessions are on. So I don't > > > think it matters if using jsessions or not, eh? > > > > > > DK > > > > > > On 4/10/06, Jennifer Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I could totally be wrong here, but I think you should be using > either > > > > the CF sessions OR the JSessions but not both. > > > > > > > > On 4/10/06, brad f <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > IIS, Sticky sessions are held via Cisco Load Balancer, using > both > > CF and J2EE > sessions. THanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Server/message.cfm/messageid:6094 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Server/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.10
