I've never timed it, so I can't say for sure. I'm sure there is SOME delay
since your adding another tag. Something else to consider is copying
application vars to the request scope, but this would entail a copy for each
hit, and would only be useful for app vars that you only read.
===================================================================
Raymond Camden, Webmaster of the Death Clock (www.deathclock.com)
Cold Fusion Jedi Master for Syntegra (www.syntegra.com)
Allaire Certified Instructor and Member of Team Allaire
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ UIN : 3679482
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Won Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 11:00 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [Help !!!! with session time outs]
>
>
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
> this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF9805.78B8A1D0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="windows-1252"
>
> what's the added overhead on <cflock> around application, session, and
> client variables?
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF9805.78B8A1D0
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="windows-1252"
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
> <HTML>
> <HEAD>
> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2448.0">
> <TITLE>RE: [Help !!!! with session time outs]</TITLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=2>what's the added overhead on <cflock>
> around application, session, and client variables?</FONT>
> </P>
>
> </BODY>
> </HTML>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF9805.78B8A1D0--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
