Yes, this works well for visual things.
But it does not allow for SpreadSheet kinds of things, like macros, data
validation, formulas, named ranges,etc,etc that many people want to have.
Steve
At 02:57 PM 4/6/2000 -0500, Fred Sanders wrote:
>Why bother with the tag. If your wanting to output nice looking
>spreadsheets and don't mind having to make painful amount nested tables you
>can have professional looking Excel97/2K spreadsheets by creating them as
>HTML files and saving them with an .xls extension before allowing the user
>to download them. I don't think it will work with anything below Excel 97
>though, but the results in the end are worth the trouble your going to go
>through getting the layout perfect.
>
>Fred Sanders
>Galveston, TX
>
>Having a bad day?
>Imagine this...
>
>You are in total seclusion from that hectic place called "The World".
>The soothing sound of a gentle waterfall fills the air with a cascading
>serenity.
>The water is clear.
>You can easily make out the face of the person you are holding underwater.
>
>Feeling better?
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dave Hannum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 11:11 AM
>Subject: Using CFX_Excel
>
>
>> Anybody got a clue on this??? 8-)
>>
>>
>> +++++ Original Message Sent 7:47am ET +++++
>>
>> Good Morning,
>>
>> Are there any known issues surrounding the use of the CFX_Excel tags? I'm
>using it for several applications now, and I was
>> wondering if there are any issues to be aware of - like, how many
>concurrent calls to Excel can it handle? The reason I've asked is
>> that two days in a row, Excel on our server caused a "kernel32.dll" error
>and locked the server. Now, assuming that nothing is
>> hosed up in Windows NT (we all know that never happens) and the Excel
>install is A-OK (which it seems to have been to the point the
>> problems started) - what are the possibilities? I'm wondering if too much
>traffic on the tag/application combo might be the
>> culprit? Also, can you do a CFLOCK to avoid this problem? Any thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> =================================
>> "Technology" is stuff that was invented after
>> you were born.
>>
>> David Hannum
>> Web Analyst/Programmer
>> Ohio University
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> (740) 597-2524
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>> Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
>> To Unsubscribe visit
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
>send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
>the body.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
>To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.
>
--
Stephen Garrett
GPS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (360) 896-2714
ICQ# 10776767
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
