At 02:23 PM 7/23/2002 -0400, you wrote: >You can still create a UDF using CFFUNCTION. You're always going to find >a use for UDFs, cause even in C++ not *everything* makes sense to have >as an object.
I would argue against this point. It really depends what type of programming design you are applying to the language. If you are applying true OO design, then it wouldn't make sense to have anything not as an object. If you are applying procedural design, then it doesn't make sense to make anything an object. If you are applying a mix of the two, then what you say is true. >In a nutshell, I don't think UDFs are going anywhere and CFCs don't >necessarily replace them. I couldn't have said it better myself. :) -- Jeffry Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Need a Web Developer? Contact me! AIM: Reboog711 | Phone: 1-203-379-0773 -- My CFMX Book: <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072225564/instantcoldfu-20> My Books: http://www.instantcoldfusion.com My Band: http://www.farcryfly.com ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
