Chris, Thanks. Finally! This worked... but only in IE6.0 . . . Netscape 4.07 and 6.2.3 still give the post expired in the cache warning. I expect they do not recognize the cache-control directive. My reading this morning indicates it is a directive for http/1.1
An odd aside... when viewing the source in the browser... the cache-control directive does not show up. However without it the operations are NOT cached by the browser. At 06:10 AM 7/24/02, you wrote: >We use ><cfheader name="cache-control" value="private"> >to allow private caching (browser) but not public caching (proxy). It's worked well >for us. Look in an HTTP book for allowable commands. > >The javascript history function gave us a lot of problems because our site is >encrypted (https) and Internet Explorer thinks javascript is not secure so throws up >a pop-up window "alerting" the user that the requested page has a mix of secure and >non-secure items. > >Chris Norloff > >---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >from: Brian Scandale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 23:24:03 -0700 > >>Nope, just scoured the source again... not a one... nothing. >> >>At 06:58 PM 7/23/02, you wrote: >>>Are you using any of the below cache control tags? >>> >>><META HTTP-EQUIV="Expires" CONTENT="Mon, 06 Jan 1990 00:00:01 GMT"> >>><META HTTP-EQUIV="Pragma" CONTENT="no-cache"> >>><META HTTP-EQUIV="Cache-Control" CONTENT="no-cache"> >>> >>><META HTTP-EQUIV="Cache-Control" CONTENT="0"> >>> >>><CFHEADER NAME="Expires" VALUE="Mon, 06 Jan 1990 00:00:01 GMT"> >>><CFHEADER NAME="Pragma" VALUE="no-cache"> >>><CFHEADER NAME="cache-control" VALUE="no-cache"> >>> >>>Joe >>>Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Brian Scandale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:49 PM >>>To: CF-Talk >>>Subject: cfmx and browser cache issue >>> >>> >>>I've been working a problem for about 3 weeks now... with no luck. I am >>>having a hard time believing I am the only one affected by this. At first >>>that is what I thought... >>> >>>I am open to any and all ideas. I now think it is a problem with CFMX. I can >>>open access to the application for those who want to see for themselves what >>>I will describe below. >>> >>>I have an application with more than 300 of this tag embedded in it: >>><input type="Button" value="GoBack" onclick="javascript:history.back();"> >>> >>>Using CF5 and deployed on (Redhat/apache 1.3) and (Win2K/IIS) I have never >>>had a problem backing up across previously posted results. Just click on the >>>GoBack Button and away we go... back. >>> >>>Now I upgrade to CFMX and I get this on both the linux and the win >>>platforms: This document resulted from a POST operation and has expired from >>>the cache. If you wish you can repost... blah blah blah. >>> >>>It happens in IE5,IE5.5,IE6.0,Netscape4.07. >>> >>>I can either rewrite the application to never goBack or try and fix this. >>> >>>Can I be the only one who experienced this on the CFMX upgrade??? >>> >>>Anyone want to look where I have been looking for weeks now? >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Brian >>> >>> >>> >> > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
