Any version of CFMX...waiting for confirmation on whether it can be done in
Pro...I think so....


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Kief [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 3:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Measuring session scope impact on memory?

Is this with CFMX for JRUN4 (currently in Beta)?

Chris


-----Original Message-----
From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 11:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Measuring session scope impact on memory?

Check this out:

http://livedocs.macromedia.com/jrun4docs/JRun_Administrators_Guide/clust
erin
g2.jsp#1113343

(watch for url wrapping)

This applies to CFMX since it runs on JRun4...and we're using it now. In
short, you specify a list of "buddy" servers running in the cluster and
CMFX
will handle automatic session sync'ing with the other machines.

Here's a snippet of what to edit in the xml properties file:

<session-config>
  <persistence-config>
    <active>true</active>
    <persistence-type>file</persistence-type>
    <persistence-synchronized>true</persistence-synchronized>
    <class-change-option>reload</class-change-option>
    <session-swapping>true</session-swapping>
    <session-swap-interval>5</session-swap-interval>
    <session-max-resident>500</session-max-resident>
    <replication-config>
      <active>true</active>
      <buddy-list>jrunserver2</buddy-list>
      <buddy-list>jrunserver3</buddy-list>
      <buddy-list>jrunserver4</buddy-list>
    </replication-config>
  </persistence-config>
  ....

That should do it!



-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 1:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Measuring session scope impact on memory?

Stacy,
            This is great info.. can you please explain on...

            "CFMX is cool because you can easily load balance the
session
data across a
            cluster just by editing a server buddy list!"

            How do you go about doing this?
Joe

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stacy Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 12:19 PM
Subject: RE: Measuring session scope impact on memory?


> Hi Andre,
>
> I'm storing plenty of objects in session scope relating to
> reporting/queries....and I've used a rather primitive method of
determining
> memory requirements....I output a typical session to flatfile and
measure
> the bytes. Then I've got a rough estimate per user session. I think
you'll
> find you can hold a lot more data with ur existing RAM then you
thought!
>
> I used to use query caching but I found it was holding recordsets
longer
> than it had to...if they're in session then they'll dissipate when the
> sessions over either via logout or browser close...but I'll be
honest...I
> wouldn't have moved to the session solution before CFMX but that's
really
> just paranoia on my part...
>
> CFMX is cool because you can easily load balance the session data
across a
> cluster just by editing a server buddy list!
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Stace
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andre Turrettini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 11:48 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Measuring session scope impact on memory?
>
> Hi, I've never read anything about this so this q is for the gurus!
Please
> read completely and thanks for your attention.  Let me describe the
issue
> then I'll ask my question.
>
> I've pretty much stuck to client vars to avoid ugly locking code.
However
> now, I have a use for them.  I need to store dozens of queries in a
> structure in the session scope.  I've got it coded and it works like a
> charm(Yes its locked) saving lots of time for the database server.
The
> performance savings is dramatic as the queries that were repeatedly
> generated each time took time away from other tasks.  Client vars
might
not
> be so good as I"d have to wddx the whole thing back and forth which
would
be
> a big chunk of data to and fro from the server.  Plus the
serialization
and
> deserialization overhead.  Cacheing the queries is not good as each
user
> will have different queries.
>
> So, to my question.  I've estimated this would take a gig of ram per
server
> to store these queries for all of our users.  So, (1)is there a way to
> measure how much memory is being allocated for session vars?  (2)When
I
look
> at the cf memory, will it go from 60megs to a gig?  Anyone tried this
and
> gotten burnt?  Thanks.  DRE
>
>
> 



______________________________________________________________________
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to