Todd,
This was my original post. All of this testing was for the same content.
Simulated 50 concurrent users on CFMX = average 85% CPU on 750Mhz
DUAL P3 Processor
Simulated 50 concurrent users on CF5.0 = average 12% CPU on
600Mhz Single P3 Processor
The content/app was written for CF4.5 and we didnt write any CF5.0
optimized code.
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 10:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources?
Joe you're not using the fusebox methodology by any chance are you?
Personally I'd love to see Joe submit this code for the app so we can break
it apart for him and show him why it's not scaling well. I think it's time
for those people that have CFMX running take a stand and say, "Gee, well..
I've been running it for over 2 months and ... whew... does it fly." Every
situation is unique I realize, but this is not rocket science here and no
one will ever admit that the fault just might lie in their code. It's very
easy to stand up and start swearing and place the blame and it's always
time consuming to get to the root of the problem and swearing and placing
the blame isn't going to get you there any faster...
Has anyone on the list thought about creating a peer review mailing
list? I realize that not everyone can sit and stare at code (we all have
our own stuff to do), I myself would be curious about being reviewed by my
peer to see if I'm on the right track.
~Todd
At 09:53 AM 7/27/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Is the app large? Are you able to break the test down to just portions at a
>time? Long shot but perhaps there's a particular operation taking place
that
>causes the memory spike.
>
>Stace
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 2:55 AM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources?
>
>Alright guys.. i have tried almost what everybody generally knows
>to CFMX perfomance..
>COM, Trusted Cache, Caching template size, Compile takes time etc...
>
>Is there anything else that has NOT been brought up? (MM Docs suck)
>This is really pityfull... CFMX! might do some EXTRA stuff.. but if it cant
>scale...atleast close to CF5.0... Why buy DAMN CFMX!!!!
>Sorry on my language.. but this is really frustrating!
>Joe
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:41 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources?
>
>
>No we are not using any COM objects.
>
>Joe
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jesse Houwing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 6:38 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources?
>
>
>Joe Eugene wrote:
> > None of the below have IMPROVED Performance.
> > 1. Trusted Cache (Enabled)
> > 2. Increased Template Cache Size (decrease Cache pops)
> > 3. Decreased Consecutive Request to "5"
> > 4. Restarted CF APP Service serveral times after setting changes.
> >
> > NONE of these have done any good so far.
>
>That's weird.
>
>Are you using COM objects? Those have had a severe slowdown in MX.
>
>If you are using COM, try replacing them with java or cfc's if possible.
>
>Otherwise generate stub's for them (that should speedup COM objects
>quite a bit).
>
>Jesse
Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.web-rat.com/
Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion
http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/
Moderator @ FlashCFM.com - http://www.flashCFM.com/
Back-end Moderator @ Ultrashock.com - http://www.ultrashock.com/
______________________________________________________________________
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
