<cfset x = "hello"/> is just following XHTML standards, nothing more. It doesn't speed or slow down your application in any case (to my knowledge).
~Todd At 04:58 PM 7/27/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Thanks Guys... for all your replies.. i will continue.. the load test >and see what i can come up with.. It would have been great...if >MM published some like >"CF Coding Practices for CFMX" Vs "CF Coding Practices BEFORE CFMX". >eg i saw a statment like <cfset x="hello"/> >MM docs.. dont imply "/" anywhere.. so where "/" come from? >it doesnt break the code.. so is this optimized CMFX? > >If this is the case.... Developers will have a lot of work..getting >code optimized for CFMX... >Joe > >-----Original Message----- >From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 4:29 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > > > > To make my point clear...I think Basic operations in > > CFMX show a degraded Performance under load...for > > specific settings.. > > I am trying to do the research.. you guys might be > > right.. There might be some internal CFMX settings > > that prove.. CFMX Scales better than... CF.50.. > > Well..where are the MAGIC SETTINGS (MM docs.. dont > > think so!).. Probably in the HEAD of some ENGINEER > > MM LAIDOFF. > >I doubt that there are any "magic settings" anywhere. The fact is, CF MX is >a completely different engine than CF 5, so the appropriate tuning settings >for CF 5 are largely irrelevant. Even with CF 5, optimal tuning settings had >to be determined by load testing your servers with their specific >applications. You'll need to repeat this process with CF MX. I suspect that >the settings you end up with may be completely different. For example, >there's a "simultaneous requests" setting; to determine the optimal value >for this, you really had to do load testing under CF 5 or any prior version. >The same is true for CF MX now, however its unlikely to be the same value as >it was for CF 5. > >You might want to approach this "from scratch" - don't follow any >assumptions about what works well with CF 5. Load test your individual >application to find the bottlenecks, and identify the operations that are >taking longer (and causing those bottlenecks). Again, they might not be the >same set of operations that caused bottlenecks in CF 5. See what changes you >can make in those operations, and test to see what difference those changes >can make. Then, once you're done load testing your application specifically, >use the same load test path to determine optimal settings for CF server >tuning switches. > >Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software >http://www.figleaf.com/ >voice: (202) 797-5496 >fax: (202) 797-5444 > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
