No, it was on IE.6.0 and has happened multiple times (the page not found error) under no load.
At 11:43 AM 13/08/02 -0700, you wrote: >Just out of curiosity Brook, have you noticed whether this has occurred >directly on Netscape 4.7? We've seen this on 4.7 only. Upgrading to >latest NN cured the problem. Actually, upgrading NN AT ALL cured the >problem. > >Just my .02 > >| -----Original Message----- >| From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >| Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 11:29 AM >| To: CF-Talk >| Subject: Re: CFMX connectivity problems (not DB-related) >| >| >| Now you mention it, I have encountered several page not found errors >| completely out of the blue with CFMX. Refresh the page and Voila, the >| problem disappears. But, I would have to agree that there is >| a problem >| here. And it has me very concerned considering we are >| planning a release of >| our new CFMX based site at the end of the month. >| >| I've also had other strange experiences with CFMX. It seems >| that sometimes >| settings change for no reason after a reboot. >| >| I really hope MM is aware (I'm sure they are) of some of >| these issues and >| that those service packs/patches will be released soon. Or >| does releasing >| Service Packs and/or patches so soon after a product launch >| look bad for >| MM? It would be nice to have some these issues listed as >| "known bugs" and >| timeliness for patches and/or workaounds. Is there anything >| like this on >| the MM site? >| >| Are there an CFMX success stories (high traffic sites?). Any >| body else care >| to share any 'bugs" or issue's they have come across while >| using CFMX? I am >| getting really nervous about our Sept 1st launch. We already >| have hundreds >| of users on our site (pay site) and they would be none to >| happy if our web >| services started acting funny. It could inevitably cost us >| business. But at >| the same time, we have already delayed our publized launch >| date due to some >| technical issues, CFMX among them and may not be able to push >| the release >| date any further. >| >| We'll have to see how it goes I guess, and hope for the best >| (and load >| test!). It would be nice to see some CFMX sites with moderate to high >| traffic who are not having issues.That would be comforting. :) >| >| Brook Davies >| maracasmedia >| >| At 11:43 AM 13/08/02 +0200, you wrote: >| >Tormod Guldvog wrote: >| > > >| > > Here's what they say (quote from their reply to my post in their >| > > forums): >| > > >| > > "If you are worried about uptime, you should not be on a >| Cold Fusion >| > > MX >| > server. We keep >| > > emailing this to our customers, putting it in newsletters etc. but >| > people are not >| > > understanding that this is a complete rewrite of the >| Macromedia Cold >| > Fusion product, and >| > > there are many pieces that don't work properly at this time. It is >| > somewhat compatible, >| > > and many features do work, but there are load issues and >| > > connectivity >| > issues to ODBC. The >| > > biggest problem is their ODBC service which they had to create in >| > > order >| > to connect from >| > > JRUN/JDBC to Windows native ODBC. The ODBC services stall just as >| > > they >| > did in Cold Fusion >| > > 4.5 before service packs. >| > >| >I would think that is exactly why MM writes in the docs JDBC >| Type 1 and >| >2 Drivers are not recommended. If the host sets up MX but does not >| >follow this recommendation all bets are off. >| > >| >Jochem >| > >| > >| > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
