Interesting thing on this subject - one of my clients is a high end
accounting back office integration company who specifically sells Great
Plains - as most of you know - probably  - which had been bought by
Microsoft.

They had required scheduled calls with all developers / companies who
developed the sites which offered and link to great plains. I used
ColdFusion - on the phone I was eventually passed to one of the lead
architects that had basically forced himself on me - ( nicely - but
annoying) that Microsoft would like to see me using .asp and I would
benefit from it. - I had several calls from them asking if we had
intentions of switching - ( we didn't )

He personally said  - developer to developer - that they have been
eating and breathing .net and asp there and it was a huge push to have
all associated sites running their stuff.

just a personal experience and call I had with them. Don't know what
it's worth - but may be interesting to you. 
jay miller
Dave Watts wrote:


Yes, and I had heard a rumor that Microsoft had bought a 
coldfusion site and not converted it. Must have been the 
winmag2000 site I guess.


No, MS doesn't own the win2000mag.com site; it's owned by Duke
Publications,
I believe.

However, in the past, MS has purchased sites running all kinds of
things,
and left them alone. This was a sensible business strategy for their
content
providers. For a long time, I believe, Hotmail ran on non-Windows
platforms.

I do remember one CF site which was purchased by MS: SubmitIt, a search
engine submission site ( http://www.submitit.com/
<http://www.submitit.com/> ). It used CF (either 1.5 or
2.0) and Perl, if I recall correctly. MS purchased it and left it alone
for
quite a while. However, when they rebuilt it as part of their bCentral
content, they rewrote a lot of the stuff using their own. There's still
CF
at work there now, though, it looks like. Go there now, and right on the
front page, look at the "sign up now" links for their submission
service:

http://submitit.bcentral.com/system/siojoin.cfm
<http://submitit.bcentral.com/system/siojoin.cfm> 

And just to prove it a bit further:

http://submitit.bcentral.com/system/Application.cfm
<http://submitit.bcentral.com/system/Application.cfm> 

But frankly, all this "who's using CF" stuff is largely a waste of time.
Should you use it because MS chose not to rewrite something they
purchased
five years ago? Probably not - you should use it because it'll let you
get a
solution done better and quicker than the alternatives.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/ <http://www.figleaf.com/> 
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444

______________________________________________________________________
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to