When Can't you use the Type 4 Driver?
At 12:40 PM 16/08/02 -0400, you wrote:
>for the record the ODBC-Socket driver is a type 3 driver. And yes Type 4
>are better then type 3 use. Use the type 4 every time you can.
>
>---nimer
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 12:40 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: Type 3/4 Drivers Vs. ODBC Socket
> >
> >
> > > Are the type 3/4 drivers superior to using the ODBC socket
> > > connection.
> >
> > Yes, generally the Type 3 and 4 drivers will work better than the ODBC
> > Socket. I wouldn't recommend using ODBC Socket unless you have to.
> >
> > > I've had a few issues with the ODBC socket connection,
> > > particularly with large client vars. I'm not sure if the
> > > other drivers will remedy the problem but I a certainly
> > > willing to try them. Where can one find more information
> > > on using these drivers Does MM have any resources.
> >
> > Jochem pointed you to the right place in the docs; for general JDBC
> > information, I'm sure there are various places to check (Sun,
> > your driver
> > vendor).
> >
> > > Does macromedia recommend the ODBC socket?
> >
> > I imagine not - it's what you use when you don't have anything else.
> >
> > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
> > http://www.figleaf.com/
> > voice: (202) 797-5496
> > fax: (202) 797-5444
> >
>
______________________________________________________________________
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
