I agree with you, Sean, and that's where I'm headed. I want to leverage the power of CFCs and open up the power of working with objects to CFers. As such, I'm starting with a blank slate.
Hal Helms Preorder "Discovering ColdFusion Components (CFCs)" at www.techspedition.com -----Original Message----- From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 6:24 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Any Fusebox and CFMX issues? On Tuesday, August 20, 2002, at 01:56 , Patrick McElhaney wrote: > No, not at all. If Fusebox was ported to CFCs, it would all be > behind-the-scenes stuff. The main reason to port to CFCs is that it > would give us a pretty good performance boost. The two books out now > would still be applicable and current Fusebox apps would work just > fine with Hal's CFC implementation. But the *real* benefits will come from Fusebox 4(?) which fully embraces CFCs for user code... Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
