> That way you don't have to rely on the CFMX compiler at all, and you can > work in all of your own optimizations, AND you don't have to deal with JSP > at all either.
So what does the $5000 software do? Oh Yea i can start writing this with C#, that does NOT require any other software and it will still be faster right? So whats your argument to your CLIENT for using CFMX just "RAD"? Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Darron J. Schall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:12 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Jsp Vs Cfm (CFMX) -- Test Code > > > Just chiming in here... > > If you're doing some code that you know can be optimized (by > looking at the > java file produced by CFMX), then doesn't is make sense to just > optimize it > yourself in java? I would imagine that if you ARE looking at the > java code, > then you at least know enough to get around. If that's the case > and you're > really worried about performace, just write you own class and methods, and > call them via > > <cfset myOwnOptimizedClass = CreateObject( 'java', 'myJavaClass' )> > > Just my 0000 0000 0000 0010 cents. > > -Darron > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
