> Dave, I hope this is not a Joke!. Are u suggesting to write 
> the Presentation logic in CFMX and use C# to write heavy 
> duty business components?

No, not really. I'm suggesting that you write the presentation logic in CF
MX and use Java to write heavy-duty business components, if you think that
the increase in performance is worth it. If you want to loop a million
times, for example, I'd suggest that you write that in Java.

It's funny that you mention Windows as an application server. If you read
best practices for "classic" ASP development, from Microsoft or others, they
always strongly recommended the use of a compiled language for the "middle
tier" - you'd only do presentation logic in ASP, and you'd do anything of
any complexity in COM with either C++ or VB. I suspect that's a little
different with .NET, but I'm not sure how different it is.

> Hardly Free? Majority of the users are running CF on Windows 
> right?

I don't know about the majority, but the fact is, a lot of the larger users
are on Unix platforms. Most enterprise deployments don't use Windows. In
fact, I can't remember working on any projects in recent years that I'd
consider enterprise deployments that have used Windows. Most have used
Solaris.

> Windows 2000 Advanced Server $3999
> http://shop.microsoft.com/Referral/ProductInfo.asp?siteID=1018
> 8&typeID=1
> Microsoft .NET Framework Free
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/default.asp?url=/downloads
> /sample.asp?ur
> l=/msdn-files/027/001/829/msdncompositedoc.xml
> 
> Where is the Cost to add an Web Application Server to Win2K?

Uh, you've neglected the cost of CALs, which would often be needed in an
intranet environment (if users are authenticated through IIS).

> *Again* we all love CF and CFMX... but my point is.. CFAS 
> should be able to be EQUALLY Competitive/Scale with other 
> Web Application Servers....

I think it's more than equal in its competitiveness with other web
application servers. The fact is, most business apps aren't doing the sorts
of calculations that you're testing, and I suspect that the difference
between performance when you've got a typical page with queries and outputs
is minimal. On the other hand, CFML code is a lot easier to debug and
maintain than, say, JSP. I think that your expectations may not be
realistic, though, considering that CF has to work with the huge volume of
legacy code out there. Maybe comparative performance will be improved over
time, but I don't think it's as simple as you might think. I think it's more
important for MM to focus on the ways that people actually use the product,
instead of atypical test cases like looping a million times.

> Why would someone spend $5000 on a software that simply 
> DOESNT Scale CORE of his application(Business components)
> ...again which are sequence of calculations, data 
> manipulations... and what not!

Perhaps because it decreases the cost of writing and maintaining
presentation logic? Five thousand dollars is a trivial amount considering
what most businesses spend on their web infrastructure, and is easily
balanced out by lower development costs - maybe a week of development time
will cover the difference!

As for data manipulation, I don't know about you, but I've always favored
moving data manipulation logic out of CF entirely. The database tends to be
really good at that, so I'd recommend doing it in the database.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444

::::::::::::: dream :: design :: develop :::::::::::::
MXDC 02 :: Join us at this all day conference for 
designers & developers to learn tips, tricks, best 
practices and more for the entire Macromedia MX suite.

September 28, 2002  ::  http://www.mxdc02.com/
(Register today, seats are limited!)
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

______________________________________________________________________
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to