Yeah, I posted it a while back.
Quick synapses:
Coders write:
<cfif 1 eq 1>
<cfoutput>blarg</cfoutput>
</cfif>
That gets made into:
public void whatever(){
=> public void doSomething(){
if(1=1){
out.write("blarg");
}
=> }
}
the part between the => can be no greater than 64k. You have no way to
predetermine what that size will be when you write the page (it happens at
about 850 though). When a page is too big you get an error like
Code of a method greater then 65535 bytes
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Problems with CFMX?
Thanks,
The only flag that goes up for me is the "large" file issue. Can you
elaborate a bit on that.
Does CFMX hang or run the file slow?
How are you defining ~850 lines?
I guess I never considered 850 lines to be big. Years ago I would get Mega
HTML forms from the dream weaver guys that were about 1150 before I started.
(I do not miss those days) Most every thing today is 300 - 500 lines
Thanks again
Mark W. Breneman
-Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
-Network / Web Server Administrator
Vivid Media
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.vividmedia.com
608.270.9770
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Rohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Problems with CFMX?
Hi Mark,
We have a very large site, and have had a few problems.
Here are some other thing you need to watch for / problems we had/have:
1. MX can not handle large .cfm files. By large I mean > ~850 lines of code
2. You could have some issues if you use fusebox methodology.
3. Jacked up database connections - I believe these are due to the fact
that MS doesn't have a SQL *7* JDBC Driver. Since you are using SQL2000 they
have native JDBC drivers so you *might* not have issues.
4. Sloppy code
5. XSL transformations can not have variables passed into them
On the plus side:
MX does XML building really, really cool and in a groovy way
Once complied the "feel" of MX is quite snappy.
Debugging is rad - especially if you know Java
CFC are cool
in cfscript you can use normal tags!
Cheers,
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Problems with CFMX?
I have been watching threads like "LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to
dump CF" and "CFMX - I've never seen anything so unstable in my life" over
the past few weeks. What has me concerned is this next few weeks I am going
to upgrade a fairly large site to CFMX. The site currently runs CF 5 and MS
SQL 2000. Are there a large number of problems with CFMX that I should know
about? Luckily I have a few weeks to play with the new servers before they
go live.
Any ETA on a CFMX .1 update? (is one needed)
Thanks
Mark W. Breneman
-Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
-Network / Web Server Administrator
Vivid Media
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.vividmedia.com
608.270.9770
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
