According to Sean, there is no way to use Flash Remoting with CF and Java from the same application server.
Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ 888-408-0900 x901 > -----Original Message----- > From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:15 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to > dump CF! > > If you have CFMX for J2EE can you remote directly to Java objects or do > you > need a second flash gateway? (Having to also purchase Flash remoting for > Java) > > Sorry if this was already answered but it's a long thread! > > Stace > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:56 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to > dump CF! > > On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 15:09 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote: > > And as I responded in IM, that isn't answer. Why? > > It *is* an answer. Saying "wibble" would be an answer. I never claimed > it was a helpful answer! > > > 1. If that was true I could buy Flash Remoting for J2EE and use it with > > CFMX > > 2. If that was true then it would work with CFMX for J2EE sitting on > > top > > of JRun 4 > > 3. If that was true then the license and the documentation would > > explicitly say it > > Hang on, you ask about CFMX *ENTERPRISE* and then start making comments > about different products! Let's stick to the original question and my > answer is absolutely correct. > > As for your assumptions above, I have no idea about (1) and I don't > know why you think a Java product would necessarily provide CFMX > functionality (how would it know about CF code?). I know how to make > (2) work but I don't think you can do it without violating the license. > As for (3), the license and documentation could itemize a lot of things > the product doesn't do but it would never be a complete list so it > would be pointless! > > > It wasn't a response; it was a copout since you don't even know the > > rational behind it yourself. > > Again, it *was* a response - you just don't like that response. As for > the rationale, yes, I know exactly why you can't access Java code > through the CFMX Enterprise built-in Flash Remoting gateway. > Unfortunately (for you), I am not at liberty to divulge why that is. > > An Architect's View -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ > > Macromedia DevCon 2002, October 27-30, Orlando, Florida > Architecting a New Internet Experience > Register today at http://www.macromedia.com/go/devcon2002 > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
