I've been having cf administrator do all of my read-only locking
automatically in a blind attempt to somehow decrease the overhead of actual
code that needs to be read and processed. Who knows - maybe this increases
it, but I just find it more convenient. Have you done any benchmarks to see
whether the "auto-locking" feature speeds or slows the app - I couldn't
imagine it being too big of a difference either way.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 2:44 PM
Subject: RE: CFLOCK timing out - why?
> > I believe that the syntax for the cflock tag in 4.5 is
> > different - you can omit the type attribute. You just need
> > the scope and the timout.
>
> The TYPE attribute isn't required, but the default value is exclusive, and
> if you can use a readonly lock instead, that would be preferable. In this
> case, it doesn't matter, but you will still use the TYPE attribute in CF
> 4.5.x.
>
> Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
> http://www.figleaf.com/
> voice: (202) 797-5496
> fax: (202) 797-5444
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
> To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
