You are correct... but i think its better to copy the variables to local scope in one sequence... instead of a lot cflocks..
<cflock scope="Session" type="READONLY" timeout="10"> <cfscript> tmpVar1=Session.SomeStruct.var1; tmpVar2=Session.SomeStruct.var2; </cfscript> </cflock> <cflock scope="Session" type="Exclusive" timeout="10"> <cfscript> Session.SomeStruct.var1=Var1; Session.SomeStruct.var2=Var2; </cfscript> </cflock> You can refer to the local scope variables in your page. Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Weeg [mailto:tony@;navtrak.net] > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 9:00 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: session vars and locking > > > hi there > > is it safe to assume that everywhere on a page, where i am either > setting or reading from session variables, that i should have cflock's > of the exclusive type (when writing to session vars) and cflocks of > the readonly type (when reading from session vars) on every single > occurence > of one of these situations? > > without fail, i mean do every single one of them in one way or the > other? > > thanks. > > ...tony > > tony weeg > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.revolutionwebdesign.com > rEvOlUtIoN wEb DeSiGn > 410.334.6331 > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
