I know a development firm that tends not to use <CF> at all, but instead puts everything in <CFSCRIPT> that they can. They claim tags are deprecated in CFML. ;)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Rohan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:42 PM Subject: RE: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP > CF syntax is not ugly, but i do get tired of typing < > > Thank God for cfscript > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:jeff@;farcryfly.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:28 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP > > > That is interesting... > Check out Slide 22 . > > I wouldn't say that CF has an ugly syntax. ( I doubt many on this list > would ). > > > At 05:13 PM 10/29/2002 -0500, you wrote: > >Check it out, in their presentation for why they chose PHP, they make > >reference as to why they didn't go with CF or ASP > > > > > > > >http://public.yahoo.com/~radwin/talks/yahoo-phpcon2002.htm > > > > > > > >Ben > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
